Is Democracy dying from within, or are we simply being sold out with so little left to take?

Advocacy of the people at a point of popularity has always been co-opted by industry advantaged funding to protect those industries. The founders of groups like Green peace and MADD will tell you absolutely they have been directed off the original course, in consideration primarily of their investor’s needs to the peril of us all. We began with the tiny snowballs of motorcycle helmets progressing to battered wives and seatbelt campaigns although beneficial to society the resolutions are not demonstrated as fine points in societal benefit. The impositions of financial punishments will always have more profound effects on some much more than others. We see today broad ranging initiatives growing in size and impositions. Who now can stop the magnitude and the velocity of those once tiny snowballs with inherently paternalist cores. Before we rush off to save the planet we should consider saving ourselves first, and the planet might just save itself as an earned benefit.

A scan of the airwaves focusing on what is the news of the day, reveals although the delivery may be found in totally separate media group organizations, the news is now found to originate with little variance from a common source. The same source with no warning now includes paid advocacy news releases boldly selling the wares of industry, presented in ad agency fashioned infomercials in highly deceptive packages. The recent Don Imas flogging for making inappropriate racist comments on his radio show, should demonstrate a failing of society in its reaction to a single person’s mistake. The one mindedness of society with no room for alternate opinions is a sign of an oppression, so subtle and firmly entrenched no one who sees it, will admit it actually exists. A media guided human nature of shamed internal balance, which has moralized the loss of many of our freedoms, not, the least of which is a right to keep what you have earned. Realities that will negate the views of individual thought and deal out personalize attacks, against any dissenting voices. We have lost the right to speak our thoughts, much more the right to think as individuals and grow as a culture. One mindedness negates the possibility of ingenuity and protection of the status quo. There are advantages to being born into a small advantaged group. That group will always seek ways of protecting its own while feasting off the efforts of the rest of us who are trained as consumers from birth to seek only the perfect beer commercial existence. An existence moving farther away from the majority of us with every new lobby promoted legislation.

One of the founding principles of democracy; is a government “of the people and for the people”. Now the majorities of people are told they should be perpetually ashamed of their own culture and they should hold the blame for all which is wrong in the world, in spite of the reality they have very little power to change those deficiencies or actually had little involvement in creating them to start with. By the power of guilting the white middle class, a perception is born; they will be the group to be ashamed and obliged to offer penance for their crimes. Just as other groups will always be made to feel inferior and jealous as the two sides are pitted against each other deliberately. The paternalist mediator inciting the conflict, is given power over both sides This is described in the Delphi control principle utilized by Adolph Hitler himself in climbing to power in 100 days Utilizing the harsh impositions of the treaty of Versailles and a tremendously devalued currency in a depression economy. He found a target middle class oppressor and many oppressed groups to champion. Later in boasting about his fine Aryan race he supplanted racial minorities as the peril to be blamed. By mediation he found political consensus in taking what each side would accept placing impositions on both in process. A persistence strategy, Delphi eventually finds a publicly accepted, oppressive state in the power of negotiation. A power principle so effective it changed a society of good and moral German people many not knowing to this day how it happened. A society who in short order accepted the horrors of the death camps, as a promoted societal necessity. Imposed in support of a personal obligation to the state; to create the perfect human condition. These principles were formed in competitive national pride. Competing with best baby contests in North America and Europe promoted by Eugenicists who sought to protect the human genome from racial degradation. Almost 100 years ago we all bought into the paternalisms, which afforded castrations of Jews and imbeciles Blacks to the back of the bus and forced lobotomies to anyone who did not measure up to the expectations of perfect communities, all by an obligation to protect our children. After the war these paternalist groups did not simply vanish they went into hiding and continued political pursuits. They survive today evolved into civil rights groups promoting abortion and civil society which eventually absorbed the Liberal left. We hear the term Neo-Con and equate it to something evil, when in reality it’s members are primarily disenchanted Liberals who came to the realization it’s current ultra left form can not be sustained without a total destruction of our culture and it’s economy which are consistent with current strategy goals.

In Canada Sheila Copps as a heritage minister exemplified an oxymoron incarnate, she supported vigorously the ideology of Trudeau-mania raising his memory to a place much greater than the man, who once turned the Canadian army against it’s own population and expressed his admiration for Canadian culture with a single finger. The words Multi-cultural heritage placed in our constitution was a cancer in how it evolved in perception. The term denies us a right to a formed and identifiable culture of our own, in favor of representing the cultures of everyone else. Sheila worked diligently making the white middle class feel perpetually ashamed of themselves for simply stating I am Canadian now effectively reduced to a racist rant, denouncing the pride which no longer exists in the politically corrected world of those paternalist small “L” news announcers, who always know better. Although at the time, it was generally believed the term spoke to a single culture formed of many, in recent times it has evolved to a meaning, much closer to the pontification of racist division The glorification of formed racial ghettos of Canada’s major cities are proof this divisiveness principle will be sustained. A culture once of Canadian identity now is divided upon itself. Generally four geographic political divisions exist in Canada media support of this self-perpetuation, is evident in the product and its distinct flavors as you move between the defined regions. How little most in Ontario know of the names Maurice Strong or the Demaris family and how these two are rarely out of the news out west, The Liberal loving east coast is still convinced the fisheries died because of mismanagement by Conservatives in a shoot the messenger kind of way. In Ontario once a stronghold for the Conservative voice we are becoming victims of unrestricted media group buyouts and the oneness of a small L media voice. A media ignoring the expansion of small L politics in the classroom and the importing of socialist friendly votes strategically placed to influence the largest electoral power. Taking advantage of cultural minorities promised a land of rice and honey, many of who spent their all, to arrive on our shores. They are being limited in their ability to apply their training and being forced to be co-opted as the working poor. Or indefinitely held as unwilling guests of the societal safety net. Imprisoned in the welfare state to promote political dominance, in spite of their needs, which are largely ignored. A racial divide and a group to be championed, are the politically advantaged after effects. Paul Martin as Prime Minister once said, “I would never support the majority to the exclusion of the minority”, which begs the question, what if the majority is right?

It should be understood the media more often than not when reviewing the actions of an Imus or a Kramer, would seek out the voice of those who were abused.. Rarely is the focus on the direct target but found in the words of racial spokespersons such as Jessie Jackson or the Reverend Al Sharpton Neither of whom it appears understood the words of Martin Luther King, what was his dream? Few actually listened apparently. Both leaders will hold his example high while self-promoting their racist and divisive ideologies. Neither has come to the realization if you want to eliminate racism you have to stop acting as a racist. When faced with impositions of others, education of that individual in mediation and finding common ground would promote a racial peace, established by example. In every situation destroying that individual is the prescribed medicine. Promoting a “them and us” division, will always prevail is a promotion of racism.

On the international front; the Chinese example is now of reaching out to other countries to sell a kind and gentle image. A similar strategy is now seen in similar actions by Libya a once villain on the international stage is now seen in many African countries as a friend who builds roads and schools Kadafy is in the news handing out T-shirts to the poor, while anti-America sentiment is growing internationally. The reality this produces is an ideology shift away from democracies and freedom eliminating the rights of individuals, gyrating toward the collectivist ideals found only in oppression and obligations to the state.

I fear in our cultural taboo in discussing the horrors of the last century, we have failed to teach the children what horrors are inspired in advocating for paternalism. A benevolent society seeks to continually improve its record of humility toward others. How can we forgive ourselves the impositions of paternalisms and teach our young with so little understanding of how we were damaged by the past, and how obviously to this day, the damage we imposed on others still remains.

Throughout democratic nations smoking bans are all the rage. Dealing hatred to those within our communities who smoke, gives us an acceptable dragon to hate. Fat people, those who drink and those who fail to obey every rule of the road. Processing finds many new allies, to make this paternalist utopia an imposed reality. All the while well-paid lobby advocates profit from the ever-present shame game.

Theoretic Science is being used flagrantly as a source of entertainment. The media brings us new shocking discovered realities by the hour, to justify the rule replacing the exception.. Risk becomes cause and cause demands action to protect the children. The result of theoretic calculation being elevated to a position above the realities of the observed and applied sciences becomes the new reality driving our political voice. Global warming and pandemics by the score are pushing us to honor the absolutes of terrorists selling the politics of fear. We have evolved as chaotic reactionaries who fear conventional Conservative values and honor the pressures of perpetual Liberal change. Democracy is about the respected and unrestricted debate of opposing views, not about political absolutes in dominance by bankroll. A current reality that finds voters in our opinion poll driven centrist struggle, asking; why vote, they are all the same? Decision makers are chastised and coerced in the media for supporting the will of the people. Demonized for denying the new science, despite how poor the quality of that science may be. A world of lobby designed Delphi control strategies are adhered to with no scrutiny of who will benefit from their institution. Yes our media groups have become entirely efficient utilizing their new tools. No one seems upset in the formation of coercive HIA Health interventions, A Burgeoning health-scare reform movement and sustainable development to keep what is done firmly in place. This inspired a large-scale growth and legitimizing of self-serving lobbies or stakeholders rallying behind Health Canada’s social marketing ploys. Telling us what we should think while ignoring what we actually do. Charity foundations selling promises of researched cures now use donations to purchase politics at levels well beyond any pursuit of the stated intent. Politicians are powerless and the public trough is open to plunder. This affords new wealth and prominence to all who play along. The sad reality is found in examining the fall of all great civilizations; on average after 200 years the decay begins when the public understands they can take from the public purse. An ability to do just that is growing by the hour. As taxes and the cost of consumer goods skyrocket to offset lobbied public expenditures and punishment without due process in taxation demands. As we continue down the paternalist road to a perfect race free of disease and mortality, it will soon make no sense to work with nothing to gain. We have to wonder if by the year 2020 as decried by the World Health Organization on a number of lobby fronts, death and misery will almost certainly prevail; if that damage will originate of pandemics or carbon gasses or as a result of expenses imposed by their kind and gentle paternalisms, protecting us from ourselves while promoting our Delphi apportioned fears.

For 50 years I have seen advertised pleadings, telling me how inexpensive it would be to feed and clothe the starving in the third world. The problem has never been an unwillingness to share. The problem stems from an ability of the rich to steal the food from the mouths of the starving, in grand schemes and burgeoning bureaucracies. A failure of self-important UN delegates who take full personal advantage of a corrupted overblown nothingness we trust with the obligation to act. Bill Gates in an interview expressed his intent to take the largest foundation fund on the planet and devote it to the elimination of specific diseases profiting drug companies in efforts of insanity, repeating actions, which have been attempted before with little success. He acknowledges it will take government funding to subsidize what he will be able to do. It fails his judgment in realizing building communities affording the benefits we all take for granted in developed countries will eliminate most of the diseases before they start, with the increased standards of living they afford in a truly Global community. Gates will fight to his end to sustain the status quo, allowing the continued use of third world victims to grow the profits of industry on both sides of the fence, profiting by the unnecessary suffering of others who need more than talk. Similarly the front end financial loading of Kyoto strategies with reduction benefits to be seen in 400 years could be replaced by an investment of only 10% of the Kyoto required investment if directed to education resulting in an improved capacity of technology and research. The results would then be seen as beneficial likely leading to environmental improvements made possible within our lifetime.

Perhaps it is time for us all to take hold of our destiny as a majority. The inequalities of democracy; of the people and old money industries who prescribe taxation and racial imbalance to keep us in our place while stealing a standard of living we have not enjoyed in far too long. An administration, which grows power, entirely proportionate to the baiting our goodwill, to the exclusion of its victims both domestic and abroad. This can be done with a single courageous legislated act. We could find that equality by demanding governments in the developed world establish national charity foundations under the control of communities, who will decide the distributions to all the others. Nationalizing in the same act the stagnant trillions of dollars in existing community subsidized foundation holdings, which serve only themselves or their contributors. Taking away a charity foundations ability to apply charity in their own self-promotion, presents a true level playing field and eliminates significantly large scale corruption and excessive administration costs.. This will afford the large corporations who profit billions every year for the first time in one hundred years, an ability to actually contribute back to communities from which they grow those profits. By their own decision to either pay taxes honoring their own imposed rules, or to continue to seek tax benefits for charitable donations to a fund they no longer control. Philanthropy Contributions, which will actually benefit communities globally, in an application of the true meaning of charity. A definition, which negates the current politically coercive abilities. For the politician with the courage to present the bill which would no doubt be supported by all parties in a public vote. I would support the award of a Nobel peace prize for the effort. Such a demonstration of courage would richly deserve international recognition, for the hundreds of millions of people world wide it would eventually benefit. And for the power we would find in a rekindled democracy it would create one reformed in political integrity and legitimate respect.